Having blasted Mass General — which in all honesty, I’m assume is about average in the charity care management — it’s worth digging deeper into what keeps people nationwide from getting the help they deserve. While the issue is complicated, in many cases it seems to boil down to indifference and lousy management.
Let’s be kind and assume that virtually all nonprofit hospitals make a legitimate effort inform patients about charity care options. That still leaves WAY, way too many who aren’t trying very hard, according to several researchers. Consider this example from a Boston-area advocacy organization:
“While the vast majority of the 99 hospitals surveyed by the Access Project and Community Catalyst mentioned the availability of free or discounted care on their websites, or when contacted by phone, less than half provided application forms and only about one-quarter included information on requirements to qualify for such care.” (Kaiser Health News)
And if you want more evidence that hospitals duck their obligations, or at least haven’t trained their staff to meet them, consider New York’s experience.
Of course, plain ol’ greed, management structures that discourage creative solutions and a raft of other influences have an impact on charity care programs. But if hospital leaders pushed responsibility, accountability and enough authority down the line to people greeting patients, it would be a good place to start. Hey, what if financial staffers got incentives based on how many appropriate referrals they’d made to internal free and discounted care programs? Wouldn’t that be wacky?
What’s your hospital doing to get financial staffers into the loop on charity care programs?
[…] When it comes to charity care, on the other hand, there’s few if any standards for informing the public of their options. And far too often, hospitals don’t get the job done. […]