Free Hospital EMR and EHR Newsletter Want to receive the latest news on EMR, Meaningful Use, ARRA and Healthcare IT sent straight to your email? Join thousands of healthcare pros who subscribe to Hospital EMR and EHR for FREE!

Remote Patient Monitoring Going Mainstream

This week I read a piece of news which suggests to me that we’re seeing a turning point in the use of remote monitoring technology to manage patients.  It looks like AT&T is taking a major public position in support of remote monitoring via the cloud, via a partnership with a  hot new startup that just raised funding, according to a report in mobihealthews.

According to the mobile health news publication, cloud-based patient monitoring company Intuitive Health just got a $3.4 million investment in what appears to be the company’s first public round of investment.

Intuitive, which completed a pilot with health system Texas Health Resources and AT&T last year, offers cloud-based remote monitoring software which can interface with any device.

The pilot involved monitoring CHF patients remotely for 90 days using wireless pulse oximeters, blood pressure cuffs and weight scales, plus tablets and apps feeding the data to the  patients’ EMR records. During the pilot, THR reduced hospital readmissions for chronic heart failure patients by 27 percent, mobihealthnews reports.

According to a press release from AT&T, Intuitive’s software has since become a key component in the telecom giant’s own SaaS patient monitoring product.

Remote monitoring has been a hot topic of discussion and an emerging approach for several years, but hasn’t found an established place in day-to-day care for most institutions.  With AT&T and Intuitive offering a device-agnostic model, however, I believe they will give a boost to the use of remote monitoring generally.

Personally, I’ve been cheering for remote monitoring to succeed for some time; after all, given how mobile-device-oriented people are anyway, it just makes sense to leverage those capabilities to improve their health.  I hope this represents a turning point for this type of technology and that we see news of more successful pilots this year.

January 31, 2013 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare consultant and analyst with 20 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies.

The Era of the Medical Body Area Network Approaches

If you’re a reader of this publication, you are probably aware that iPads and smartphones aren’t the only devices struggling to find their place on emerging healthcare networks.  For example, medical devices are increasingly going wireless (see our recent story on wireless smart infusion pumps) and becoming edge devices feeding into the EMR.

Now, enter the wireless sensor as a contender. In an intriguing move, the agency is considering setting aside spectrum specifically dedicated to Medical Body Area Networks (MBAN), groups of patient-attached sensors collecting clinical information and transmitting it wirelessly to enterprise systems.

The FCC announced late last month that it would like to reserve the 2.36 to 2.40 gHz band exclusively for MBAN devices.  If it does so, it will make the United States the first country ever to allocate spectrum exclusively for such purposes.

According to data provided by Smartplanet.com, 80 percent of doctors support the use of MBAN devices.  That’s logical, considering that doctors are already used to using wireless smartphones, iPads, Android tablets and laptops to send and retrieve medical data.

As doctors grow  used to being able to access more data more of  the time, I’m not surprised that they’d want patients monitored wirelessly as well.  EMR, iPad and the wirelessly-connected patient are a common-sense trifecta that seems ripe to reduce hospital readmissions, improve outcomes and allow patients to be safely monitored at home.

Now, even if the FCC moves ahead with its plans — which it says are intended to spark MBAN innovations — that doesn’t mean hospitals will opt to pay for the emerging technology.  Most will probably wait until there’s a significant body of evidence and  use cases to support buying wireless sensors and  integrating them with their EMR.

In the mean time, though, I’ve got to say I’m excited to hear about this. Remote monitoring of patients, be it at home, in a hospital, skilled nursing facility or other setting, just seems like a great idea. MBAN use can offer immediate benefits in a world where such are rare indeed. I say, “FCC, bring it on!”

June 4, 2012 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare consultant and analyst with 20 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies.