Free Hospital EMR and EHR Newsletter Want to receive the latest news on EMR, Meaningful Use, ARRA and Healthcare IT sent straight to your email? Join thousands of healthcare pros who subscribe to Hospital EMR and EHR for FREE!

Is Apple HealthKit Headed For Hospital Dominance?

Posted on February 12, 2015 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare editor and analyst with 25 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. She can be reached at @ziegerhealth or www.ziegerhealthcare.com.

Even for a company with the cash and reach of Apple, crashing the healthcare party is quite an undertaking.  Not only does healthcare come with unique technical challenges, it’s quite the conservative business, in many cases clinging to old technologies and approaches longer than other data-driven industries.

Of late, however, Apple’s HealthKit has attracted the attention of some high-profile healthcare institutions, such as New Orleans-based Ochsner Medical Center and Stanford Healthcare. All told, a total of fourteen major U.S. hospitals are running trials of HealthKit. What’s more, more than 600 developers are integrating HealthKit tech into their own health and fitness apps.

What’s particularly interesting is that some of these healthcare organizations are integrating Apple’s new patient-facing, iOS HealthKit app with Epic EMRs and the HealthKit enterprise platform.  If this works out, it could vault Apple into a much more lucrative position in the industry, as bringing together health app, platform and EMR accomplishes one of the major steps in leveraging mobile health.

According to MobiHealthNews, the new app allows patients to check out test results, manage prescriptions, set appointments, hold video visits with Stanford doctors, review medical bills — and perhaps most significantly, upload their vital signs remotely and have the data added to their Epic chart. This is a big step forward for hospitals, but even more so for doctors, many of whom have warned that they have no time to manage a separate stream of mobile patient data as part of patient care.

For Apple leaders, the next step will be to roll out the upcoming Apple Watch and integrate it into its expanding Internet of Apple Healthcare Things. CEO Tim Cook is pitching the Apple Watch as a key component in promoting consumer health. While the iPhone gathers data, the smart watch will proactively remind consumers to move. “If I sit for too long, it will actually tap me on the wrist to remind me to get up and move, because a lot of doctors think sitting is the new cancer,” Cook told an audience at an investor conference recently.

All that being said, it’s not as though Apple is marching through healthcare corridor’s unopposed. For example, Samsung is very focused on becoming the mobile healthcare  technology provider of choice. For example, in November, Samsung announced relationships with 24 health IT partners, including Aetna, the Cleveland Clinic and Cigna.

At its second annual developer conference last December, Samsung introduced an array of software tools designed to support the buildout of a digital health ecosystem, including the Samsung Digital Health SDK and Gear S SDK, which lets app makers create software compatible with Samsung’s smart watches. Also, Samsung is already on the second generation of its Simband reference design for wearable device design, as well as the cloud-based Samsung Architecture for Multimodal Interactions, which collects sensor data.

And Microsoft, of course, is not going to sit and watch idly as a multibillion-dollar market goes to competitors. For example, late last year the tech giant launched a fitness tracking wristband and mobile health app. It’s also kicked off a HealthKit-like platform, imaginatively dubbed Microsoft Health, which among other things, allows fitness band users to store data and transfer it to the Microsoft Health app. Microsoft isn’t winning the PR war as of yet — Apple still has a gift for doing that — but have no doubt that it’s lurking in the swamps like an alligator, ready to close its powerful jaws on the next right opportunity to expand its healthcare presence.

Bottom line, Apple has captured some big-name pilot testers for its HealthKit platform and related products, but the game is just beginning. Having users in place is a good start, but Apple is miles away from being able to declare itself the leader in the emerging hospital mobile health market.

A Turning Point? Wearables Could Save 1.3M Lives by 2020

Posted on December 22, 2014 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare editor and analyst with 25 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. She can be reached at @ziegerhealth or www.ziegerhealthcare.com.

For years, wearable health bands have been expensive toys useful almost exclusively to fit people who wanted to get fitter. On their own, wearables may be chic, sophisticated and even produce medically relevant information for the user, but they haven’t been integrated into practical care strategies for other populations.

And with good reason. For one thing, doctors don’t need to know whether an otherwise-healthy patient took 10,000 steps during a run, what their heart rate was on Thursdays in June or even what their pulse ox reading was if they’re not wheezy asthmatics. Just as importantly, today’s EMRs don’t allow for importing and analyzing this data even if it is important for that particular patient.

But as the banners at last week’s mHealth Summit pointed out, we’re headed for the era of the mHealth ecosystem, a world were all the various pieces needed to make patient generated data relevant are in place. That means good things for the future health of all patients, not just fitness nuts.  In fact, a Swiss analyst firm is predicting that smart wearable devices will save 1.3 million lives by 2020, largely through reductions in mortality to in-hospital use of such devices, according to mobihealthnews.

New research from Switzerland-based Soreon Research argues that smart wearables, connected directly with smart devices, projects that using wearables for in-hospital monitoring will probably save about 700,000 lives of the 1.3 million it expects to see preserved by 2020. Even better, wearables can then take the modern outside the hospital. “New wearable technology can easily extend monitoring functions beyond the intensive care unit and alert medical professionals to any follow on medical problems a patient may develop,” according to Soreon Research Director Pascal Koenig.

Not surprisingly, given their focus on monitoring aerobic activities, Soreon projects that wearables can be particularly helpful in avoiding cardiovascular disease and obesity. The firm believes that monitoring patients with wearables could prevent 230,000 deaths due to cardiovascular diseases, and reduce obesity related deaths by 150,000.

And that’s just a taste of how omnipresent wearables use may be within a few years. In fact, Soreon believes that patients with chronic conditions will help push up the smart wearables market from $2 billion today to $41 billion, or more than 1000% growth. That’s a pretty staggering growth rate regardless of how you look at it, but particularly given that at the moment, clinical use of smart wearables is largely in the pilot stage.

What few if any pundits are discussing — notably, as I see it — is what software tools hospitals will use to crunch this flood of data that will wash it on top of the astonishing volume of data EMRs are already producing.

True, at the mHealth Summit there were vendors pitching dashboards for just this purpose, who argued that their tools would allow healthcare organizations to manage populations via wearable. And of course tools like Apple HealthKit and Microsoft Health hope to serve as middlemen who can get the job done.

These solutions will definitely offer some value to providers. Still, I’d argue that wearables will not make a huge impact on clinical outcomes until the day what they produce can be managed efficiently within the EMR environment a provider uses, and I don’t see players like Epic and Cerner making big moves in this direction. When the mHealth ecosystem comes together it’s likely to produce everything analysts predict and more, but bringing things together may take much longer than they expect.

Here’s What Makes Henry Ford Health System’s Employee Innovation Program Tick

Posted on November 25, 2014 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare editor and analyst with 25 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. She can be reached at @ziegerhealth or www.ziegerhealthcare.com.

Hospitals are increasingly launching efforts designed to leverage new technologies, be they working with healthcare accelerators, taking advantage of employee ideas or setting up onsite centers designed to support a culture of innovation. One institution which has gotten a little further down the road than many of its peers is Henry Ford Health System, whose innovations program has paid off handsomely, generating countless smart, useful inventions from its employees.

So serious is the health system about exploiting its employees’ great ideas that it’s made organized efforts to reward such thinking directly. For example, HFHS just completed the competition among employees to submit their best ideas in clinical applications for wearable technology. The institution not only encouraged employees to participate, but sweetened the pot by offering a total of $10,000 in prizes to winners of the contest.

Winning entries included:

*  A system designed to record and encourage mobility of acute care patients by using wearable activity trackers
*  A recovery tool for total hip replacement patients which monitors and limits range of motion to rehab by using wearable sensors
*  A health and wellness reminder system for elderly patients, leveraging location-based sensors and smart watches
*  A mobile game interface, powered by activity trackers, designed to encourage childhood exercise and fight obesity

Certainly, the employees must appreciate the cash prizes, but they told a Forbes reporter that they’d participate even if there were no prizes, because what they really enjoy is having the experience and access to the program. That’s a pretty telling indicator that simply appreciating their concepts goes a long way.

This contest comes as part of larger efforts to make the health system innovation friendly. “The most important word is yes,” said Nancy Schlichting, the system’s CEO in a Forbes interview. “It is difficult to create a culture of innovation. If you shut down one person to shut down everyone, because bad news travels fast. When it comes to innovation, my mantra is yes.”

Other efforts to encourage employee intrapreneurship include big rewards for success in product development. The HFHS intellectual property policy offers a 50% share of future revenues coming from product ideas that end up in the market. That’s a pretty impressive call to action for employees who might have a great idea in their hip pocket.

Yet a third way the health system encourages innovation is to bypass employees’ natural fear of failure by tapping into their desire to help people. By encouraging clinicians to focus on patient care improvements, for example, the system drew staff cardiologist Dr. Dee Dee Wang to create a breakthrough method for more accurately sizing artificial heart valves and planning trans-catheter surgeries using 3-D printed models from CT scans. (She worked with Dr. William O’Neill in this work.)

So if they can generate great innovations, why aren’t more health systems and hospitals launching programs like these?

I don’t think the direct cost of creating such a program is much of an obstacle, especially for a multi-hospital system. It may require hiring a senior exec to spearhead the effort, but that’s not a huge investment for entities that size.

My guess is that one reason they don’t move ahead is management bandwidth — that health leaders simply don’t feel they have the time, energy and focus to kick off such a program at the moment. But I also suspect that C-suite execs just haven’t given much thought to the untapped potential their employees have for creating incredible solutions to critical health care problems. Sadly, I suspect it’s more the latter than the former.

The Various Approaches to Mobility in Healthcare

Posted on September 9, 2014 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

I’m about to head down to the CTIA Super Mobility Week conference. I try to attend a few conferences each year that aren’t directly related to healthcare and health IT in order to get a broader perspective on what’s happening in the rest of the world. I think this will be one such case (although, they do have some mHealth sessions and exhibitors as well).

As I started to think about mobility and where it’s headed, the industry is all about the smart phone and smart mobile devices. I think it’s an incredibly powerful concept and one that will only become more important. However, I think that many people are taking it too far. While I love my smartphone and its capabilities, I still love the productivity that’s possible with a great desktop setup with dual monitors, a mouse and a keyboard. I’m not sure we’ll replicate that in a mobile world and I’m not sure we should.

In fact, it’s one of the trends I hate most about many of the website designs that are coming out lately. They are going all in on mobile and in the process they’re killing the productivity of the desktop experience. It’s a travesty and continues to annoy me with many of the applications I use on a daily basis.

We can apply this same principle to healthcare IT. Often we need to step back and ask ourselves if something really needs to be mobile or not. Plus, if we decide to make something mobile, we need to ensure that those who still use the same application in a non-mobile environment have their workflow optimized as well.

At the end of the day, we need to create a much more sophisticated approach to mobile computing. There are many times when a doctor or nurse really need whatever they’re working on to be mobile. There are extreme benefits to having a point of care device which allows the nurse or doctor to document at the point of care. However, there are just as many times when mobility is actually a hindrance to the required workflow.

What are you doing in your organization to leverage the amazing mobile technologies that are out there while still maintaining the optimized workflow?

UPMC Kicks Off Mobility Program

Posted on July 1, 2014 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare editor and analyst with 25 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. She can be reached at @ziegerhealth or www.ziegerhealthcare.com.

If you’re going to look at how physicians use health IT in hospitals, it doesn’t hurt to go to doctors at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, a $10 billion collosus with a history of HIT innovation. UPMC spans 21 hospitals and employs more than 3,500 physicians, and it’s smack in the middle of a mobile rollout.

Recently, Intel Health & Life Sciences blogger Ben Wilson reached to three UPMC doctors responsible for substantial health IT work, including Dr. Rasu Shrestha, Vice President of Medical Information for all of UPMC, Dr. Oscar Marroquin, a cardiologist responsible for clinical analytics and new care model initiatives, and Dr. Shivdev Rao, an academic cardiologist.

We don’t have space to recap all of the stuff Wilson captured in his interview, but here’s a few ideas worth taking away from the doctors’ responses:

Healthcare organizations are “data rich and information poor”: UPMC, for its part, has 5.4 petabytes of data on hand, and that store of data is doubling every 18 months. According to Dr. Shrestha, hospitals must find ways to find patterns and condense data in a useful, intelligent, actionable manner, such as figuring out whether there are specific times you must alert clinicians, and determine whether there are specific sensors tracking to specific types of metrics that are important from a HIM perspective.

Mobility has had a positive impact on patient care:  These doctors are enthusiastic about the benefits of mobility.  Dr. Marroquin notes that not only do mobile devices put patient care information at his finger tips and allow for intelligent solutions, it also allows him to share information with patients, making it easier to explain why he’s doing a give test or treatment.

BYOD can work if sensitive information is protected:  UPMC has been supporting varied mobile devices that physicians bring into its facilities, but has struggled with security and access. Dr. Shrestha notes that he and his colleagues have been very careful to evaluate all of the devices and different operating systems, making sure data doesn’t reside on a mobile device without some form of security.

On the self-promotion front, Wilson asks the doctors about a pilot  project (an Intel and Microsoft effort dubbed Convergence) in which clinicians use Surface tablets powered by Windows 8. Given that this is an Intel blog, you won’t be surprised to read that Dr. Shrestha is quite happy with the Surface tablet, particularly the form factor which allows doctors to flip the screen over and actually show patients trends.

Regardless, it’s interesting to hear from doctors who are gradually changing how they practice due to mobile tech. Clearly, UPMC has solved neither its big data problems nor phone/tablet security issues completely, but it seems that its management is deeply engaged in addressing these issues.

Meanwhile, it will be interesting to see how far Convergence gets. Right now, Convergence just involves giving heart doctors at UPMC’s Presbyterian Hospital a couple dozen Microsoft Surface Pro 3 tablets, but HIT leaders plan to eventually roll out 2,000 of the tablets.

Pennsylvania Hospital Sees Data Breach

Posted on June 16, 2014 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare editor and analyst with 25 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. She can be reached at @ziegerhealth or www.ziegerhealthcare.com.

No matter how careful you are with patient data, there’s always a way for it to slip out the door or be accessed illegitimately. That’s why a Pennsylvania-based hospital has been forced this to notify almost 2,000 patients that an employee had committed a HIPAA breach.

The 551-bed Penn State Milton S. Hershey hospital learned, after conducting an internal investigation, that an employee accessed and transmitted protected health data outside of the hospital’s secure information network. The hospital was forced to inform 1,801 patients that their names, medical record numbers, lab tests and results and visit dates could conceivably have been accessed by unauthorized persons or entities due to an employee mistake.

The HIPAA breach was due to a mistake by a Penn State Hershey clinical laboratory technician, who was authorized to work with PHI but did so insecurely. The lab tech accessed patient data via an insecure USB devices through his home network rather than the hospital network, as well as sending patient data via his personal email address to two hospital physicians.

To date, Penn State Hershey has had a respectable track record for security. As HealthcareITNews notes, this is the first large HIPAA breach the facility has reported to HHS.

But there’s clearly an education gap here if an otherwise well-behaved lab tech didn’t know that he be compromising data if he accessed and sent it this way.

To prevent breaches like this from becoming common, hospitals need to keep up an ongoing education program which continually re-emphasizes the dangers of outside-network communication, unencrypted communications, data storage on easily stolen laptops and phones and more. But few hospitals offer the level of education required to fend off everyday accidents like this one.

But education isn’t the only security challenge facing hospital IT departments. There’s also an issue that remains in hospital security which, as we discuss HIPAA breaches, is worth a quick note. While it’s critical to educate staffers  on what they can do to avoid HIPAA breaches, health IT departments themselves may need a refresher from time to time,  notes my colleague John Lynn.

John notes that while hospital IT staffers may have strong antivirus software protecting their facility, their malware protections are often weak, as software that locks staff computers down too much often makes users angry.

As he sees it, the next wave of security breaches may not be due to human error (or malicious content) but unseen malware quietly feeding data to health data thieves. Not only that, he expects to see personal mobile phones get compromised and infect the hospital network. All scary stuff.

The CIO’s Guide to HIPAA Compliant Text Messaging

Posted on January 15, 2014 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 10 blogs containing over 8000 articles with John having written over 4000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 16 million times. John also manages Healthcare IT Central and Healthcare IT Today, the leading career Health IT job board and blog. John is co-founder of InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and LinkedIn.

Yesterday I wrote a piece on EMR and EHR where I talk about why Secure Text Messaging is Better Than SMS. I think it makes a solid case for why every organization should be using some sort of secure text messaging solution. Plus, I do so without trying to use fear of HIPAA violations to make the case.

However, you can certainly make the case for a secure text messaging solution in healthcare based on HIPAA compliance. In fact, the people at Imprivata have essentially made that case really well in their CIO Guide to HIPAA Compliant Text Messaging. This is well worth a read if you’re in a healthcare organization that could be at risk for insecure texting (yes, that’s every organization).

They break down the path to compliance into 3 steps:

  1. Policy – Establish an organizational policy
  2. Product – Identify and appropriate text messaging solution
  3. Practice – Implement and actively managing the text messaging solution.

Texting is a reality in hospitals today and the best solution isn’t suppression, but enabling users with a secure solution. The checklists in the CIO Guide to HIPAA Compliant Text Messaging provide a great foundation for making sure your organization is enabling your users in a HIPAA compliant manner.

ICUs Can Improve Survival, Speed Discharges Using Telehealth

Posted on December 10, 2013 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare editor and analyst with 25 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. She can be reached at @ziegerhealth or www.ziegerhealthcare.com.

ICUs can boost patient survival rates and speed ICU and hospital discharge rates if they use tele-ICU technologies, a study published  in CHEST Journal concludes, according to a report in iHealthBeat.

The study involved researching the impact of tele-ICU technologies in 56 ICUs that were part of 32 hospitals and 19 health systems, tracking them over a five-year period, according to iHealthBeat. The project, which was led by Craig Lilly, director of UMass Memorial Medical Center’s eICU Program, involved more than 110,000 patients.

The hospitals involved in the study used the Phillips Healthcare eICU technology, a comprehensive set-up which included bidirectional audio and video equipment, population management tools and real-time and retrospective reporting tools.

The study looked at how ICU doctors created treatments based on best practices, and responded to patient alerts and alarms, iHealthBeat notes.

Researchers found that patients who received care in hospitals using telemedicine were 26 percent more likely to survive in the ICU than patients in units that didn’t use tele-ICU technologies. It also found that patients were 16 percent more likely to survive their hospitalization than their counterparts who didn’t receive tele-ICU services.

What’s more, researchers found that patients in ICUs using telemedicine saw 20 percent faster discharges in the ICU and 15 percent faster hospital discharges.

This research strongly suggests that tele-ICU is maturing, and should be taken seriously as part of a hospital’s treatment arsenal.  In fact, your hospital might want to take a look at a new set of best practices created by the New England Healthcare Institute designed to make tele-ICU more scalable and accessible to hospitals.

Ultimately, the ideal is to connect telemedicine — and other remote sources of data — to hospital EMRs, allowing a new level of collaboration between far-flung clinicians. But in the mean time, it seems that tele-ICU can offer great benefits even if it creates a data silo for the time being.

Deploying WiFi For Clinicians, Hospital Guests A Complex Problem

Posted on December 3, 2013 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare editor and analyst with 25 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. She can be reached at @ziegerhealth or www.ziegerhealthcare.com.

These days, offering WiFi for both hospital visitors and clinicians is pretty much de rigeur. The problem is, clinicians need different things from their Wi-Fi connection than consumers do. And as a recent story in Healthcare IT News notes, that can make it difficult to keep up with everyone’s demands.

According to Ali Youssef, senior clinical mobile solutions architect at Detroit-based Henry Ford Health System, maintaining a wireless network that suits everyone’s needs is “moving target.”

Youssef was responsible for planning and implementing the HFHS wireless network, which included expanding coverage from 4 million to 8 million square feet. What’s more, the network rollout had to take into account the needs of the HFHS enterprise EMR system, according to the HIN piece.

For Youssef, one of the most difficult problems health IT managers face in this situation is provisioning bandwidth appropriately to all the different types of devices that will share the bandwidth.

Not surprisingly, Youssef believes that one of the most important ways to see that everyone has enough bandwidth is regular contact with the system’s clinicians.

In some situations, clinicians may need far more bandwidth then the IT department had anticipated, for example, where clinician is launching a new project fueled by grant money, notes the Healthcare IT News piece. (We’re also increasingly see a growing list of wireless medical devices, such as wireless glucometers, edge into mainstream clinical care.)

To cope with these rapidly changing demands, Youssef recommends planning for a high level of wireless system redundancy and conducting site surveys.

And in what may be a more difficult challenge, he recommends that network architects keep continuous tabs on what types of devices are going to be used, and testing them see how they behave on their health system’s network.

Youssef didn’t offer any detailed advice on how to accommodate hospital visitors in this story, but clearly, they will pose a significant challenge to any hospital network architect as well.

Particularly as apps become part of patients’ health system experience, network architects will need to bear consumer experience of the network in mind as well. It will be interesting to see, over the next few years, whether consumer wireless health use demands a fresh approach to network architecture generally.

Hospital Residents Question Value of iPad For Clinical Rounding

Posted on November 13, 2013 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare editor and analyst with 25 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies. She can be reached at @ziegerhealth or www.ziegerhealthcare.com.

Though the iPad has a sexy reputation — the Apple mystique is alive and well — it may not not necessarily the best tool to use for clinical rounding or education, according to a new study published in the Journal of Mobile Technology in Medicine. That being said, there’s a lot of issues with the study, as you’ll see below.

First, the study design. During the 2011-2012 academic year, researchers gave iPads to 102 medical and surgical residents at Riverside Methodist Hospital in Ohio. The tablets were 16 GB iPad2 models with wireless Internet capabilities, reports iHealthBeat. The iPads had Wi-Fi but no cellular network connectivity, which left many residents complaining about hit-or-miss connectivity.

At the end of the academic year, researchers surveyed the residents to learn how iPad use had worked for them. What they found out was that while the residents largely liked the iPads, they didn’t find them useful for clinical rounding. On the other hand, though the study doesn’t address this directly, they had reason to be uncomfortable.

Of the 102 residents, only 14.7 percent used the iPad on rounds, and a scant 7.8 percent said the tablet helped them document care more efficiently. But it should be noted that the iPads were running only VMware View, not an iPad-native care system, forcing the residents to cope with an interface designed for seated users on keyboards.

Meanwhile, almost 58 percent of respondents said that the iPad was useful for sourcing articles outside of the hospital and 52 percent said the iPad was valuable for research.

The medical residents also valued the iPad for making recommendations to a colleague (58.3 percent), facilitating patient care (45.8 percent), as an educational tool (41.7 percent) and to view results and use as a guide for evidence-based practice (38.9 percent). (Surgical residents were much less impressed, with, for example, only 6.7 percent agreeing that the tablet was a valuable educational tool.)

Despite its flaws, the study does make one important point — that it’s well past time for EMR vendors to create iPad-usable interfaces, rather than forcing residents to use some awkwardly hacked version of their desktop/laptop product. If this study is any indication, large numbers of residents like the iPad a great deal, but they’re not going to use it for documentation unless they have a good user experience.  Vendors, your move.

P.S. By the way, if you want to read about a case in which iPads are being used in daily rounds, check out this piece from drChrono that was highlighted on the Apple iPad website.