Free Hospital EMR and EHR Newsletter Want to receive the latest news on EMR, Meaningful Use, ARRA and Healthcare IT sent straight to your email? Join thousands of healthcare pros who subscribe to Hospital EMR and EHR for FREE!

Hospital EMR and EHR Recruiting

Late last year, I acquired the healthcare IT career website Healthcare IT Central. Since bringing Healthcare IT Central into the Healthcare Scene family, I’ve dove head first into the healthcare IT Recruiting and career space. It’s been quite an adventure with a lot of great learning for me along the way.

What I’ve learned most is that there are some really amazing people working in healthcare IT and some really amazing companies that are trying their best to make healthcare better. There are a lot of screwed up things in healthcare, but the people are generally good people and a real pleasure to work with.

Health IT Job Seekers
If you’re in the job market and looking for a healthcare IT job, take a few minutes to register as a job seeker where you can upload your resume and apply for jobs at some of the top healthcare IT companies. Also, be sure to check out some of these popular job searches:

Of course, you can always do your own health IT job search using the criteria that matter for you. All of this is all free for the job seeker.

Health IT Employers
If you’re a health IT company or a hospital organization looking to hire qualified healthcare IT professionals, you can register and post your jobs as well. We just passed over 20,000 registered job seekers and are getting close to 11,000 active health IT focused resumes.

We also have other options available to employers like eNewsletter sponsorships (almost 16,000 email subscribers), webinars, and resume database access where you can search for specific candidates.

We’re working really hard to be an amazing health IT career resource for both job seekers and employers. If you have any feedback on the site and what we’re doing, we’d love to hear it on our contact us page.

April 17, 2014 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 15 blogs containing almost 5000 articles with John having written over 2000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 9.3 million times. John also recently launched two new companies: InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com, and is an advisor to docBeat. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and Google Plus.

Outsourcing Your Disaster Recovery Team

I imagine most hospital CIOs are overwhelmed by the total number of systems and applications that they have to support. Hospital systems can have hundreds of applications that they’re required to support. Along with having to support the day to day operations of these systems, you also have to plan for business continuity and disaster recovery as well.

Every 6 months to a year, it seems we get a stark reminder of the need for good disaster recovery thanks to some devastating hurricane, earthquake, or other natural disaster. Plus, the stories of Hurricane Katrina and Super Storm Sandy and their impact at hospitals still ring in my ears and likely many other hospital CIOs.

Considering this background, I was intrigued by this Florida Hospital Case Study on Disaster Recovery. Obviously, Florida sits out there in a position that’s just waiting to be hit by a hurricane. So, good disaster recovery is a necessity for them.

What was most intriguing to me was that this hospital chose to use a managed recovery program from SunGard to make this a reality. While I don’t suggest outsourcing all of your disaster recovery (you need in house expertise deeply involved), I think it’s a great idea to work with a third party provider for your disaster recovery.

First, there are so many systems that it’s great to have a third party hold you accountable for all of your systems. Second, a third party can ensure that you do proper and regular disaster recovery testing of your systems. Third, they can provide an outside perspective that can improve your internal approach to disaster recovery.

Many of the above items can be done in house as well, but we all know that there’s a certain level of accountability that comes from having paid someone to hold you accountable. Otherwise, it’s really easy for one of your staff who’s being pulled in a hundred different directions to let your disaster recovery program slip through the cracks.

April 10, 2014 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 15 blogs containing almost 5000 articles with John having written over 2000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 9.3 million times. John also recently launched two new companies: InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com, and is an advisor to docBeat. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and Google Plus.

Interview with Dana Sellers: Encore Pay for Perfomance (P4P) Managed Services

The following is an interview with Dana Sellers, CEO of Encore Health Resources about their new Pay for Performance Managed Services offering which they’ll be sharing at HIMSS 2014.
Dana Sellers
Tell us your vision for how your new P4P Managed Services will work.
Our vision is to help our clients manage performance and data components against payer contracts to maximize quality, obtain incentives, and avoid penalties. Our offering uses a combination of Encore subject-matter experts (SMEs), software tools, and methodologies that we’ve already tested and proven in large healthcare systems. P4P Managed Services lifts the burden of meeting these value-based demands off our clients’ shoulders and into Encore’s hands. As part of this innovative offering, we also share risks and rewards via multi-year partnerships. We work with clients to ensure that they have the trusted data they need to support performance improvement and obtain incentives.

Our service begins with the P4P Value-driven Roadmap, which identifies the dollars and associated measures at stake in clients’ at-risk, value-based contracts — including projections for the next few years. As input for the roadmap, we perform a data assessment of a client’s EHR and other source systems to determine if they are capturing the right data for the targeted measures. The roadmap defines the multi-year data and process program required to obtain the desired incentives.

Next, we establish this required program along with data governance, technology, and data tools. We also build the value components of the program, including EHR remediation, workflow redesign, change management, data profiling, ETL, and dashboards required to monitor performance.

Once the program foundation is established, the value-management cycle begins. Encore monitors each client’s performance, providing insight through performance analysis and suggesting needed performance improvements to meet all targeted incentives and enhance the quality of care. Also, as new contracts emerge, we work with clients to incorporate new eMeasures into the program.

By creating trusted, transparent data, Encore helps health systems transform and meet new payment-model requirements by using eMeasures to adhere to evidence-based standards. The result is better patient care and an improved bottom line. We provide the consulting expertise, unique methodologies, and our own, in-house developed software tools to help our clients succeed — as we’ve proven by our results in helping other large clients accelerate their achievements through eMeasures.

Why did you choose to offer a service like this?
We know EHR data! Our methodologies and software tools are built around EHR data and eMeasures.

Encore was founded to provide consulting services with a focus on analytics fueled by clinical data. In the broad spectrum of consulting services that we provide – from HIT and clinical advisory to implementation, go-live services, and analytics — our focus is trained on identifying and gathering the data that our clients need to improve healthcare and operational performance. Therefore, our P4P Managed Services offering is a natural extension of our mission. At-risk contracts require the ability to track eMeasures, which has been an Encore strength – and differentiator — since our founding five years ago.

Our vision for P4P Managed Services is also supported by our clients – especially CIOs and CFOs. They have told us that they need assistance with all aspects of data capture, analytics, and performance improvement. When we lift that burden from our clients’ shoulders, it frees them to focus on other critical issues, such as cost reduction, while we leverage our unique expertise and proven experience to manage the value side of the equation.

Which P4P programs do you see Encore supporting?
We support measures — quality measures that go back to incentives. These include Medicare, Medicaid, commercial P4P/Fee-for-Value type contracts, IQR, PQRS, ACO, ACAs, ACCs, NQF/CQMs, PCMH, PCQUS, clinically integrated networks, and the like.

Our methodology and tools tie the eMeasures directly to workflow, so we know how to change each client’s workflow to get better results. Our knowledge bases include over 350 eMeasures.

How much of this offering is technical and how much of it is services.
This is an important question. Encore is first and foremost a services company – a services company that is strongly differentiated by unmatched, in-house-developed software solutions that are uniquely designed to support the services we provide. So our new offering is precisely that: services supported by innovative technology and processes on a flexible, as-needed basis.

What does the cost structure look like for this service?
As described earlier, the P4P Managed Services cost structure is based upon a roadmap we define with each client to quantify the value-based, at-risk dollars and the client’s capabilities to manage the quality-performance components of their at-risk contracts. Contract details, therefore, will vary with each client’s situation. The bottom line is that Encore is willing to manage our P4P Managed Services contracts while working with clients to define a risk-sharing arrangement that incents everyone to achieve.

Why would an organization choose to outsource the P4P to Encore as opposed to doing it in-house?
The process of managing performance against eMeasures across a health system is complex, and many clients have not put together a disciplined approach to performance improvement. Further, many of our clients are telling us that they simply do not have the full complement of expertise, resources, technology, and program-management disciplines available to move fast enough against a dizzying array of government and commercial at-risk contracts. But we do, and we – especially our skilled eMeasures experts — have a track record that proves it.

Also, an increasing number of health systems are recognizing that they’ll have to enter a world of eMeasures that is growing every year. With P4P Managed Services, we bring the expertise, skills, tools, and methodology that can take this eMeasure world and our clients under our wing. Our new service provides clients the breathing room to focus on multiple fronts simultaneously – and not leave any dollars on the table as a result.

A third reason for choosing our new offering is because it’s a cost-conscious solution. We eliminate the need for clients to hire more architects, eMeasures specialists, analysts, and report builders.

Finally, P4P Managed Services can preserve endangered species. That is, we supplement our clients’ existing IT department with some of the hardest resources to find: clinicians and operational SMEs with an understanding of data; eMeasures experts; and, technical SMEs with an understanding of the clinical and the operational worlds.

How much accountability is Encore taking on with these P4P Managed Services? Where do you draw the line?
Our new offering is a full life-cycle solution that we approach as a partnership. We nail down the amount of accountability – the risk that we’re able to share – on a case-by-case basis through the roadmap. Depending upon what we learn, we then determine the degree of accountability that both we and our clients can share to incent the highest levels of achievement.

Is there some risk on Encore’s part that the client will fall short on what they need to accomplish for Encore to provide the P4P services? Encore can’t go in and do the documentation for the doctor.
This is precisely what our new service is in place to define. As with every engagement, we use a thorough, careful assessment process to ascertain the nature of the challenges involved. With P4P Managed Services, that means understanding:
• The incentives involved
• The risk involved if our clients can’t achieve optimal revenue reimbursement – say with Medicare and Medicaid contracts
• The risk involved for Encore if those contractual incentives are not earned
Bottom line: we both win, or we both lose. With P4P managed services, we are convinced that we can define on a case-by-case basis the mix of Encore services, solutions, and client resources that Encore will manage to produce a win or multiple wins for both sides.

This feels similar to revenue cycle management (RCM) applied to P4P programs. Can you apply some of the RCM learnings to this type of offering?
Yes, similarities do exist between RCM and the management of quality performance components of at-risk contracts. The way we see it, RCM has been responsible for collecting patient data and getting claims ready for a long time. It remains fairly unchanged and encompasses the management of people, processes, and technology across health systems to improve revenue collection. By tying eMeasures to clinical rather than latent claims data, performance issues can be corrected within a few days. That is because the use of EHR data literally “moves the needle” in real time. Beyond claims data, we use EHR clinical data to affect change that meets the required quality measures thresholds.

At present, there is an increased focus on traditional cost monitoring, which informs RCM. This typically happens at the service line and department level; not at the episode-of-care level. Although direct, indirect, fixed, and ad-hoc costs are certainly important and are included, value-based cost control and reduction efforts must focus on the clinical processes, just like the quality performance components. Both will require tracking the costs and quality across the entire continuum of care, constantly analyzing performance and applying adjustments. And the revenue cycle is a significant piece of this. So the discipline and techniques needed for RCM can certainly inform a health system’s approach to fee-for-value focused management.

Do you see this as the start of offering even more Managed Services offerings?
Yes. We are now working on another offering – it’s in the packaging stages – around Meta-Data Management. Stay tuned for more details later this year.

February 20, 2014 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 15 blogs containing almost 5000 articles with John having written over 2000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 9.3 million times. John also recently launched two new companies: InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com, and is an advisor to docBeat. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and Google Plus.

Managing Legacy Health IT Systems

One of the realities of healthcare IT is the mass of legacy healthcare IT systems that an organization has to support. I remember one hospital CIO saying that they had over 100 different health IT systems in their organization that they were supporting. Now expand that over the years and you can imagine how many of those systems get replaced and the old legacy system has to be supported.

I’m sure many are asking why they don’t just sunset the system. In many cases there are regulations and laws around how long you have to retain the healthcare data that’s stored in these systems. Other times there isn’t a good way to get the data out of the legacy system and the organization still needs access to the data. Regardless of the reason, every hospital has a number of legacy systems.

A little while ago I was talking with a consulting company and they pointed out something really interesting. Many times hospitals find themselves in a situation where they have a legacy system they have to support, but all their expertise in that legacy system has moved on from the organization. It turns out that this presents a great opportunity for these consulting companies to leverage the legacy software experience of their consultants. Many of these consulting companies do amazingly well just consulting on legacy systems. It’s amazing.

In my G+ hangout today, we also touched on this topic. The question of how to host the legacy system is often an important consideration. In the video interview, Jason Mendenhall pointed out that for legacy system’s, you often don’t want to move it to some new high end cloud infrastructure. In fact, it’s very likely that it’s not even possible. However, it’s nice to have all your health IT hosted in a place that can support the full gamut of needs from legacy servers to high end cloud computing.

I’d love to hear more about people’s strategy when it comes to legacy applications. Also, can we learn from our current experience that will help avoid future legacy application misery?

January 28, 2014 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 15 blogs containing almost 5000 articles with John having written over 2000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 9.3 million times. John also recently launched two new companies: InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com, and is an advisor to docBeat. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and Google Plus.

What Can Go Wrong With An Epic Implementation

With Epic owning the lion’s share of new EMR implementations — it has as many in progress or planned as all other major vendors combined — it’s good to stop and look at just what can go wrong with an Epic implementation.

After all, while Epic installations are a fact of life, all of the news they generate isn’t good. In fact, a growing number of stories of botched Epic installs and institutional fallout are beginning to mount.

In an effort to do learn more about Epic’s strengths and weaknesses, researchers at The Advisory Board Company interviewed some of Epic’s most experienced U.S. hospital customers, as well as some of the busiest Epic implementation consultants, writes senior research director Doug Thompson.

As Thompson points out, the problems Advisory Board identified could impact any big EMR install, but with Epic in the lead, it doesn’t hurt to focus on its products specifically.  (By the way, according to the Advisory Board, there were 194 Epic installs in process or contracted for 2012 and 2013; the closest competitor, MEDITECH, had 59 and Cerner came in at 55.)

So what’s behind the stumbling? Thompson names several limitations to Epic’s own approach to implementation, including the following:

* Its young implementation staffers may be enthusiastic, but some lack operational experience in hospitals or medical practices, which means they rely heavily on Epic’s standard methods and tools –and that may not be adequate for some situations.

* Though Epic’s recommended implementation staffing numbers are higher than that of most other EMR vendors, their estimate nonetheless falls short often by 20 percent to 30 percent of the need.

*Epic’s “foundation” (model) installation plan limits customization or extensive configuration until after the EMR has gone live, which can lead to less physician buy-in and end-user cooperation.

To address these concerns, Thompson offers fourteen techniques to help hospitals get the value they want.  Some of my favorites include:

Begin with the end in mind: Make sure your facility has specific, measurable benefits they hope to achieve with your Epic implementation, and prepare to measure and manage progress in that direction.

Governance: Make sure you assign appropriate roles and responsibilities in managing your Epic rollout and ongoing use. While IT will serve as the linchpin of the project, of course, it’s critical to make sure the appropriate operations leaders have a clear sense of how Epic can and should affect their areas of responsibility.

Get outside input on project staffing: While Epic is upfront about the need for extensive staffing in its implementation, as noted its estimates still come in rather low. It’s a good idea to get in objective outside estimate as to how big the project staff really needs to be.

For more information, I highly recommend you read the full Advisory Board brief. But in short, as  the report concludes, it seems that relying too much on Epic’s approach, staff and tools can lead to problems. Surprised?

December 9, 2013 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare consultant and analyst with 20 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies.

Should Health IT Consulting Companies Do Software?

I’ve had a lot of conversations recently with a lot of the top health IT and EHR consulting companies out there today. I imagine this is partially a result of attending the CHIME Annual Forum and also bringing the Healthcare IT Central’s job board into the Healthcare Scene network. Either way, I’ve been intrigued by all the various approaches that healthcare IT consulting companies take.

In one of my conversations, someone suggested to me that if a health IT consulting company does software and consulting, then it angers the health IT software vendors. On its face you can see where this could be a challenge. In some cases it can turn a consulting company into a competitor with the software company. I think there’s a nuanced way to approach this that can avoid the issue in many cases, but no doubt it takes a unique leader with a special vision to handle the balance.

In another conversation with Ivo Nelson we were discussing his software and consulting company. I asked him why he had two companies with practically the same name and addressing much of the same market area. He then told me that it was because he believed that it was really hard to have a software company and a consulting company under the same roof. As we talked more I realized that the real challenge is that if you try and do both, one of them becomes the red-headed step child that doesn’t get enough attention (nothing against red heads or step children since I love them both).

What do you think? Can a consulting company also be a software vendor? I look forward to hearing your thoughts in the comments.

December 4, 2013 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 15 blogs containing almost 5000 articles with John having written over 2000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 9.3 million times. John also recently launched two new companies: InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com, and is an advisor to docBeat. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and Google Plus.

DoD, VA Spent Bulk of 2012 iEHR Budget on Support Contracts

The VA and DoD’s iEHR project may or may not come together, but it seems clear that at least one party is getting ahead — the vendors the agencies retained to support the project.

A new report from the Interagency Program Office concludes that the two agencies spent more than $300 million funding support contracts for iEHR work in 2012.  The IPO’s job is  to modernize the Military Health System’s EMR software.

DoD and the VA have been working to build a joint integrated EMR, known as the iEHR, since 2009. The idea is to build an EMR which allows every service member to have and maintain a single personal electronic health record through their career and lifetime.

However, to say the project has been troubled is an understatement, with changes of strategy riddling the effort throughout its lifespan.

In February, for example, the iEHR project was halted, with officials electing to make their current EMR systems more interoperable.

A few months later, DoD Secretary Chuck Hagel wrote a memo stating that the agency will consider a commercial EMR system. Most recently, the DoD asked 27 EMR vendors to provide demos of possible EMR replacements.

Most recently, the DoD announced that it was looking for contractors that can support its current EMR, AHLTA, through 2018.

All  I can say is that if you’re following all of this you’re way ahead of me. With so many switches in direction, I can’t imagine anything lasting and good coming out of the process. Maybe you have to be military to get it. As for me, I see a strategy process that seems to be governed by something resembling a coin flip.

November 27, 2013 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare consultant and analyst with 20 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies.

Study: Health IT Jobs 2.5% Of All Healthcare Hiring

New research has concluded that 2.5 percent of all healthcare hiring is health IT-related, according to a report in EHR Intelligence.

The study, which lumps EHR system implementation, informatics and other healtlh IT skills into the mix, was published Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society.

According to researcher Aaron Schwartz and colleagues, most of the 434,282 positions open are driven by opportunities created by the  HITECH Act. During the study period, which corresponded with the implementation of HITECH, researchers found an 86 percent increase in monthly job postings including “electronic health record” or “clinical informatics,” EHR Intelligence notes.

Implementation support was the most desired skill, with 43 percent of listings asking for recruits with system installation, purchasing or workflow design skills.

Only 39 percent of job listings were posted by healthcare providers, the study found. This suggests a very heavy reliance on recruiters to fill these positions, which require difficult-to-find skillsets.

Things haven’t changed much since 2011, where the study cuts off. Not surprisingly, health IT hiring continues at a fevered pace, with hospitals and IT vendors competing for employees with the same skills.

A HIMSS study released this summer, which surveyed 225 executives across hospital and health IT vendor sectors, found that 85 percent of respondents had hired at least one employee during 2012, and 79 percent of execs in these sectors plan to bring on more stuff during this year.

This survey found that providers were more likely to be hiring for clinical application support and help desk staff, while vendors were more likely to be hiring on sales and marketing personnel.

Unfortunately, the supply of HIT talent seems to be inadequate — CIOs say that they’re barely meeting their needs — and the educational system can only crank out graduates so quickly. This doesn’t bode well for hospitals, which can only rely on pricey consultants for so long.  Let’s hope someone comes up with a strategy for training up new health IT workers more quickly!

October 16, 2013 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare consultant and analyst with 20 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies.

Lessons Learned from Sutter’s EHR Implementation Challenges

One of our more popular recent posts was published on EMR and HIPAA and was titled, “Adding Insult To Injury, Sutter’s Epic EMR Crashes For A Day.” When the post was shared on LinkedIn, it prompted a really insightful discussion on EMR training and Sutter’s approach to EHR implementation. A few of the comments were so good that I wanted to share them for more people to read and learn.

The first comment is from Scott Kennedy, an Epic Stork Trainer:

I was an Epic training consultant on the E. Bay Sutter EHR implementation and I can tell you first hand that Sutter Admin, and the Nurses are at odds. This unfortunate relationship made it difficult to train the staff. Epic itself is not to blame. Those who are using the Epic EHR are not as trained as they should be.

Sutter used an “in house” training team rather than bringing on a full consulting team with much more experience in training and educating end users. The “in house’ trainers included some nurses, RTs, and the like as well as a host of newly graduated college students who had less to no experience with conducting a formal training presentation on a multidisciplinary EHR.

Hiring and training “in house” is a great addition to bringing on an experienced, skilled, professional team of Epic credentialed trainers, like myself who do this as a profession all over the country.

We were also directed by Sutter EHR implementation Administration to “facilitate” rather than “train.” “Facilitate included passing out exercise booklets to the clinical end users and having them work on their own, rather than conducing concise, lectured, guided practice prior to each exercise. Hands on exercises are an essential part of the training, but should not be the complete focus of training.

The learner is left on their own to figure out the system, which is counter productive. That approach only builds anxiety, confusion and eventual resentment for the system and the administration who have chosen the EHR they are fumbling through.

I empathize with the clinical end users. There training experience could have been much more instrumental in getting them off on the right foot with their new EHR, had the training approach been more adult learning theory based rather than self-learning based.

I only wish I could come back to Sutter and retrain the nurses and other clinicians from the proven, consistent, progressive, successful adult learning approach, which enables and empowers the end user to grasp, comprehend and assimilate the EHR system into their daily shift work flow. That is not to say that there are not implementation bumps and optimization needs that have to be addressed, but they are far less impactful when the clinician is properly trained.

I am so sorry Sutter nurses and staff that I trained, but I was firmly told to “facilitate” your learning rather than “train” you. I tried to implement adult learning methodology, but was told by your EHR administration to “stop talking and let them do it on their own.”

Epic EHR is not to blame here. Epic is a sound, EHR system that is serving the needs of millions of patients and their care providers around the world, without incidents such as those being experienced at Sutter.

There is a right way to implement and train and a wrong way. Sorry Sutter EHR implementation administration, but “I told you so!”

I asked Scott Kennedy if he’d thought of leaving the project since it was being done the wrong way and he offered the following response:

@ John, yes I did come very close to leaving the project. As a matter of fact after I was verbally “scolded” for lecturing to much I phoned my recruiter and asked to be placed on another project, but then, after careful thought, I decided to stay on the project and attempt to train and support as much as I could. But it seems that my individual efforts were not enough to counter the original training “facilitation” focus.

To add insult to injury those of us trainers who were there for the Sutter E. Bay implementation were told not to return for the W. Bay implementation. The EHR administration wanted an entirely new outside consulting team.

I got a fellow colleague on the project, hoping that the E. Bay administration would have learned from and the current W. Bay implementation would be better. The training colleague I got on the W. Bay project shared with me that it was worse than the E. Bay implementation. They kept the experienced Epic trainers as support and utilized them as little as possible for actual front end training. So sad, really.

The EHR administration at Sutter tried to cut every financial corner possible and lost sight of the long run implications of improper front end training. Now they are paying the price.

Michael A. P., an EMR consultant offered this insight as well:

I’ve also had the misfortune of working with Sutter for a (thankfully) brief period. In their long history of attempting to implement Epic, they could be counted on to make the wrong decision in almost every situation. Their internal politics trump the advice they receive from vendors and highly experienced consultants. The result is an implementation that serves neither the patient or the users best interests.

Then, Ryan Thousand, an IT Architect at Athens Regional Medical Center, offered a broader view of what’s happening in health IT and EHR:

I hate to say it but most large healthcare organizations are getting like this as well…. There are WAY too many layers in these organizations and sometimes to get work done can mean 4 weeks of executive meetings and in the end no decision or 100% opposite of the recommended direction given. That being said, with the rapid change in healthcare and the mergers and acquisitions occurring right now, I fear the worries for Healthcare in general over the next couple of years. We cannot continue to try to meet mandates the government is making while still ensuring 100% utmost patient care; and in the end that is really all I care about.. the patient in the bed who is BENEFITING from my implementation. Change is always tough but done the right way with the right people (as you all stated above was not done correctly) we will continue to see great things happen on the HIT side. But unless Epic/Cerner all the big players in the markets as well as the local clinician and providers work together and decide the best outcomes for our patients, we will all one day suffer, as we will all one day be patients.

In all the years I’ve been writing about EMR and EHR, the biggest problem with most EMR implementations is lack of EHR training or poor EHR training. It’s really amazing the impact quality EHR training can have on an implementation. However, many organizations use that as a way to save money. If they could only see the long term costs of that choice.

September 25, 2013 I Written By

John Lynn is the Founder of the HealthcareScene.com blog network which currently consists of 15 blogs containing almost 5000 articles with John having written over 2000 of the articles himself. These EMR and Healthcare IT related articles have been viewed over 9.3 million times. John also recently launched two new companies: InfluentialNetworks.com and Physia.com, and is an advisor to docBeat. John is highly involved in social media, and in addition to his blogs can also be found on Twitter: @techguy and @ehrandhit and Google Plus.

W. VA. Rolls Out Enhancements To VistA

Officials with the West Virginia bureau of behavior health and health facilities are putting some finishing touches on VistA installations cutting across the state, adding computerized laboratory information to a six-year-old implementation.

West Virginia officials have implemented Vista in seven communities, Modern Healthcare reports. Facilities include an acute-care hospital, two psychiatric hospitals, four long-term care hospitals, a nursing home and two ambulatory care clinics.  The facilities are all connected to a central database in Charleston via T1 lines.

The state has been working on contract with Medsphere Systems Corp. to install a VistA version known as FOIA VistA, a version in the public domain that can be obtained freely from the VA under the Freedom of Information Act, Modern Healthcare notes.

Though VistA itself is free, the state has spent heavily on installing it across the seven sites.  Since FY 2005, West Virginia has paid Medsphere $8.4 million for system implementation, development and support, and is contracted to pay the vendor $939,800 this year for support.

In addition to paying Medsphere a monthly fee for systems support, the state pays licensing fees to InterSystems, developer of Cache, a version of the MUMPS database and programming language. It also licenses Keane’s financial system, which interfaces with VistA.

West Virginia began looking at a common infrastructure for all of its facilities when HIPAA passed back in 1996, noting that the idea behind it was portability and accountability. Now state officials are glad they moved ahead. “It’s expensive,” but “in terms of satisfaction, I think we’d all agree it was well worth it,” deputy commissioner for administration Craig Richards told the magazine.

May 7, 2013 I Written By

Anne Zieger is veteran healthcare consultant and analyst with 20 years of industry experience. Zieger formerly served as editor-in-chief of FierceHealthcare.com and her commentaries have appeared in dozens of international business publications, including Forbes, Business Week and Information Week. She has also contributed content to hundreds of healthcare and health IT organizations, including several Fortune 500 companies.